chartier:

Michael Degusta crunches a lot of data on software updates for the iPhone versus every Android phone shipped in the US before July 2010. Then he nails the crux of the problem with the Android ecosystem:


  It appears to be a widely held viewpoint that there’s no incentive for smartphone manufacturers to update the OS: because manufacturers don’t make any money after the hardware sale, they want you to buy another phone as soon as possible. If that’s really the case, the phone manufacturers are spectacularly dumb: ignoring the 2 year contract cycle & abandoning your users isn’t going to engender much loyalty when they do buy a new phone. Further, it’s been fairly well established that Apple also really only makes money from hardware sales, and yet their long term update support is excellent (see chart).
  
  In other words, Apple’s way of getting you to buy a new phone is to make you really happy with your current one, whereas apparently Android phone makers think they can get you to buy a new phone by making you really unhappy with your current one. Then again, all of this may be ascribing motives and intent where none exist - it’s entirely possible that the root cause of the problem is just flat-out bad management (and/or the aforementioned spectacular dumbness).


My iPhone 3 was pretty junky after the 4.0 update, despite the fact that it was supported. I don’t recall if Apple ever got the performance back on par with how it was under the last versions of the iOS 3.  (It was a much slower phone than the 3GS, which now runs iOS5.)

What’s pretty striking about the Android charts are that it’s pretty random as to what will happen when you buy your phone. It’s also interesting to see how many phones launch with an OS that is already out of date. (Sometimes two revisions out of date!)

chartier:

Michael Degusta crunches a lot of data on software updates for the iPhone versus every Android phone shipped in the US before July 2010. Then he nails the crux of the problem with the Android ecosystem:

It appears to be a widely held viewpoint that there’s no incentive for smartphone manufacturers to update the OS: because manufacturers don’t make any money after the hardware sale, they want you to buy another phone as soon as possible. If that’s really the case, the phone manufacturers are spectacularly dumb: ignoring the 2 year contract cycle & abandoning your users isn’t going to engender much loyalty when they do buy a new phone. Further, it’s been fairly well established that Apple also really only makes money from hardware sales, and yet their long term update support is excellent (see chart).

In other words, Apple’s way of getting you to buy a new phone is to make you really happy with your current one, whereas apparently Android phone makers think they can get you to buy a new phone by making you really unhappy with your current one. Then again, all of this may be ascribing motives and intent where none exist - it’s entirely possible that the root cause of the problem is just flat-out bad management (and/or the aforementioned spectacular dumbness).

My iPhone 3 was pretty junky after the 4.0 update, despite the fact that it was supported. I don’t recall if Apple ever got the performance back on par with how it was under the last versions of the iOS 3. (It was a much slower phone than the 3GS, which now runs iOS5.)

What’s pretty striking about the Android charts are that it’s pretty random as to what will happen when you buy your phone. It’s also interesting to see how many phones launch with an OS that is already out of date. (Sometimes two revisions out of date!)

(Source: chartier)

 
Apple often gets dinged for cutting support to older hardware, forcing users to upgrade if they want the latest and greatest software. So I feel it’s necessary to point out that the iPhone 3GS is 7 months older than the Nexus One. And guess what it runs? Apple’s just-released latest and greatest operating system, iOS 5.